Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
New Zealand Human Rights Commission Submissions |
Last Updated: 28 April 2015
Clerk of the Committee
Commerce Committee
Select Committee
Office
Parliament Buildings
WELLINGTON
20 March 2008
Attn:
Fenella Bovett
REVIEW OF THE TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND
CHARTER
The Human Rights Commission (the Commission) welcomes this
opportunity to comment on the review of the TVNZ Charter (the Charter).
The
Commission is an independent Crown Entity which operates under the Human Rights
Act 1993. As well as promoting and protecting
human rights, the Commission is
charged by statute with encouraging the development and maintenance of
harmonious relationships between
the diverse groups that make up New Zealand
society.
The Commission has a strong interest in promoting, protecting
and strengthening freedom of expression as set out in the Universal
Declaration
of Human Rights and the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and affirmed in
the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.
The media plays an important role in
the protection of this right, and has wide influence in terms of encouraging
harmonious relationships
and understanding between diverse groups in New
Zealand.
The Commission commends the work of the Working Party,
consisting of representatives from Corporate Affairs at TVNZ, the broadcasting
policy section of the Ministry for Culture and Heritage and the Unitec School of
Communication. The Working Party reviewed and analysed
public submissions on
the original redraft of the Charter prepared by TVNZ, and subsequently revised
the Charter to capture this
public comment. The Commission would like to
express its general support for the Working Party’s recommendations in
their
Revised TVNZ Charter. The report of the Working Party gives substantial
weight and consideration to public submissions on the review
and, on the whole,
has significantly incorporated this feedback into its redrafted version of the
Charter.
There are, however, a few points to which the Commission would
like to draw further attention. These include general comments as
well as
specific suggestions on points in the Charter, as follows.
1 An
Informed Society
The Commission understands this section of the
Charter to cover three main issues:
1) Ensuring that New Zealand
society is informed and educated by balanced, comprehensive and quality
television broadcasting. The
points in this section give due weight to these
requirements.
2) The role of the media in encouraging harmonious
relations in New Zealand.
The Commission agrees with the Working
Party’s recommendation that point
1(f),[1] ‘Provide programmes
that extend the range of ideas and experiences available to New
Zealanders’, should be moved to section
one, An Informed Society.
Developing an informed society is a vital piece in achieving harmonious
relations between diverse groups in New Zealand. This
process necessarily
involves extending the range of ideas and experiences available to New
Zealanders. Point 1(f) is therefore more
appropriately linked with the section
on developing an informed society than with innovation in the media (section
six).
3) Guaranteeing access to information for all New
Zealanders.
Section one of the Charter also has implications in terms of
access to information and education by everyone in New Zealand. Point
2(g)
under National Identity and Citizenship should, therefore, be moved to
section one, An Informed Society. ‘Enabling New Zealanders of all
abilities to engage with the fullest range of programmes’ is indisputably
essential
to creating an informed society. We cannot claim that our society as
a whole is informed and educated by our media if only a selection
of groups in
New Zealand is able to access this information.
2 National Identity
and Citizenship
While section one concerns the provision of and
access to information, the Commission understands section two of the Charter to
be
more specifically about the content of television programming. This involves
the role of the media in providing a voice for and
representation of the diverse
cultures and peoples of New Zealand. The Commission, therefore, supports the
emphasis in point 2(c)
on many-sided debate, as a means to facilitate mutual
understanding between diverse groups in New Zealand society. The Commission
also supports the comments of the Working Party regarding points 2(d) and 2(f),
that ‘minority perspectives should be included
not only in programmes
aimed at those minorities but also in programmes intended for general
audiences’; and that the ‘public
broadcaster’s obligation to
help engender empathy and understanding among different groups in society’
should be provided
for in this section of the
Charter.[2]
While the
Commission supports the inclusion of point 2(g) for the reasons given by the
Working Party in their report, this point is
more about access to information,
rather than content, and should be moved to section one, An Informed
Society, as discussed above.
3 Maori
The Commission
welcomes the Working Party’s suggested rewording of point 3(a). The
Commission’s previous submission on
this point stated that ‘while
the concepts of participation and voice are still present, the redrafted
statement diminishes
the importance of ensuring that Maori participate in the
planning of television programming’. The proposed redraft states
that
TVNZ will ‘provide programmes by, for and about Maori involving
significant Maori participation and perspectives’.
This statement goes
much further towards ensuring the genuine participation of Maori at all levels
of television programming, and
does not imply token representation of Maori.
4 Diversity
The Commission supports the Working
Party’s changes to point 4(d). A more positive and proactive approach to
promoting understanding
between the diverse groups in New Zealand society is
vital, especially with regards to the influence and pervasiveness of the media.
The Charter’s force and relevance within the present New Zealand context
would be compromised by replacing this concept with
simply reflecting the
cultures of New Zealand (as proposed in TVNZ’s initial redraft of the
Charter). In the context of New
Zealand’s increasing cultural diversity,
it is important that media play a role in promoting understanding between the
diverse
cultures of New Zealand.
Point 4(d) could also benefit from the
addition of languages, as follows:
‘Provide programmes that
promote understanding of New Zealand’s diversity of cultures,
languages and regions’. This would draw out the strong connections
that many New Zealanders have between their language and identity,
not least of
which are the Deaf community, and those who are involved in revitalising te reo
Maori and Pacific languages, to name
a few examples.
Conclusion
The Working Party has been very comprehensive
in addressing the concerns raised in the public submission process which was
held last
year. The Commission commends this work, as it is clear that the
principle of participation has been given due weight throughout
this process.
The Working Party’s Redrafted TVNZ Charter is an improvement on both the
current Charter and the proposed redraft
of the Charter by TVNZ. The Commission
supports the Working Party’s redrafted Charter, on the whole, and
encourages the Commerce
Committee to consider the above points in its review of
the TNVZ Charter.
The Commission would be happy to discuss these issues
with you in more detail if desired. Should you need further information, please
contact Vida Hollander, Policy Analyst, Race Relations, Strategic Policy Team at
vidah@hrc.co.nz .
Yours
sincerely,
Joris de Bres
Race Relations
Commissioner
Kaihautū Whakawhanaunga a Iwi
[1] References to points in the
TVNZ Charter are based on the Working Party’s redrafted
version.
[2] Review of Public
Submissions on the Redraft of the TVNZ Charter: Report of the Chair of the
Working Party, September 2007, page 7.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZHRCSub/2008/1.html