Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2010 GST ADMINISTRATION MEASURES NO. 1) BILL 2010


2008-2009-2010




               THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA











                          HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES











    tax laws amendment (2010 GST administration measures no. 1) bill 2010














                           EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM














                     (Circulated by the authority of the
                      Treasurer, the Hon Wayne Swan MP)






Table of contents


Glossary    1


General outline and financial impact    3


Chapter 1    Adjustments for third party payments  5


Chapter 2    Attribution of input tax credits      15


Index 19






Do not remove section break.





         The following abbreviations and acronyms are used throughout this
         explanatory memorandum.

|Abbreviation        |Definition                   |
|BAS                 |business activity statement  |
|GST                 |goods and services tax       |
|GST Act             |A New Tax System (Goods and  |
|                    |Services Tax) Act 1999       |
|TAA 1953            |Taxation Administration Act  |
|                    |1953                         |

General outline and financial impact

Adjustments for third party payments

         Schedule 1 to this Bill amends the A New Tax System (Goods and
         Services Tax) Act 1999 to ensure that the appropriate amount of
         goods and services tax is collected and the appropriate amount of
         input tax credits claimed in situations where there are payments
         between parties in a supply chain, which indirectly alter the price
         paid or received by the parties for the things supplied, but for
         which an adjustment does not presently arise because the parties
         are not directly involved in a supply from one to the other.
         Date of effect:  This measure has effect on and from 1 July 2010.
         Proposal announced:  The measure was announced in the then
         Assistant Treasurer's Media Release No. 042 of 12 May 2009.
         Financial impact:  This measure will have these revenue
         implications:

|2009-10   |2010-11   |2011-12   |2012-13   |2013-14   |
|Nil       |Low       |Low       |Low       |Low       |


         Compliance cost impact:  Low.

Attribution of input tax credits

         Schedule 2 to this Bill amends the A New Tax System (Goods and
         Services Tax) Act 1999 to clarify that until the expiry of the
         relevant limitation period, input tax credits may always be claimed
         in the current tax period.
         Date of effect:  This measure has effect on and from 1 July 2010.
         Proposal announced:  This measure was announced in the then
         Assistant Treasurer's Media Release No. 042 of 12 May 2009.
         Financial impact:  Negligible.  This measure clarifies the
         interpretation of the law in a manner consistent with current
         administration.
         Compliance cost impact:  Negligible.  This measure clarifies the
         interpretation of the law in a manner consistent with current
         practice.
         This measure also has a negligible transitional impact.  No changes
         to existing systems or practice are required.

Chapter 1
Adjustments for third party payments

Outline of chapter


      1. Schedule 1 to this Bill amends the A New Tax System (Goods and
         Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) to ensure that the appropriate
         amount of goods and services tax (GST) is collected and the
         appropriate amount of input tax credits claimed in situations where
         there are payments between parties in a supply chain which
         indirectly alter the price paid or received by the parties for the
         things supplied.


      2. This is achieved by creating an adjustment to apply in situations
         where an entity (the payer) supplying things for re-sale makes a
         monetary payment to a third party (the payee) in connection with
         the payee's acquisition of those things.  This adjustment occurs
         when the payer does not supply the things directly to the payee but
         rather through a supply chain.


Context of amendments


      3. The amount of GST paid or input tax credits claimed in a previous
         tax period may need to be adjusted to ensure that the correct GST
         outcome is obtained when circumstances change.  Adjustments may
         arise due to, among other things, changes in consideration such as
         a change in price due to a discount.  A third party rebate may not
         give rise to an adjustment because it would not, ordinarily, alter
         the consideration for the supply by the payer to its customer, or
         the consideration paid for the acquisition by the payee from its
         supplier.


      4. An adjustment is either an increasing or decreasing adjustment.  An
         increasing adjustment is added to the net amount for a tax period,
         which will either increase the amount payable by the entity to the
         Australian Taxation Office (ATO), or reduce the amount payable by
         the ATO to the entity.  A decreasing adjustment is subtracted from
         the net amount for a tax period, which will either decrease the
         amount payable by the entity to the ATO, or increase the amount
         payable by the ATO to the entity.


      5. Where a registered entity supplies things to another entity and
         that second entity supplies those things to a third party, the
         original supplier of the things sometimes makes a payment, such as
         a rebate, to the third party - a third party payment.  As the law
         currently operates, the original supplier must remit GST based on
         the price for which it sells the things to the second entity, with
         no adjustment for the third party payment.  The third party can
         claim an input tax credit based on the price paid to its supplier
         with no adjustment for the third party payment.

Summary of new law

      6. Where the payment to the payee indirectly reduces the amount the
         payer receives for a supply, the payer will be entitled to a
         decreasing adjustment reflecting the difference between the GST
         remitted on the original supply and the GST which would have been
         payable on the supply if the consideration was calculated net of
         the third party payment.  The payee will have an increasing
         adjustment if the acquisition was for a creditable purpose.  This
         adjustment will arise even if there are several interposed entities
         in the supply chain.

Comparison of key features of new law and current law

|New law                  |Current law              |
|The payer will be        |A payment by a supplier  |
|entitled to make a       |to a third party in a    |
|decreasing adjustment in |supply chain does not    |
|the event that, having   |ordinarily give rise to  |
|made a taxable supply to |an adjustment for the    |
|an entity, it makes a    |payer.                   |
|payment to a third party |A payment received by a  |
|in the supply chain which|recipient from a third   |
|indirectly reduces the   |party in a supply chain  |
|payment received by the  |does not ordinarily give |
|payer for the thing      |rise to an adjustment for|
|supplied.                |the payee.               |
|Where the payee acquires |                         |
|the thing for a          |                         |
|creditable purpose the   |                         |
|third party payment will |                         |
|also result in an        |                         |
|increasing adjustment for|                         |
|the payee.               |                         |
|The decreasing adjustment|                         |
|will be attributable to  |                         |
|the tax period in which  |                         |
|the payer first holds a  |                         |
|third party adjustment   |                         |
|note.                    |                         |
|The payer is responsible |                         |
|for issuing the third    |                         |
|party adjustment note    |                         |
|within 28 days of the    |                         |
|earlier of becoming aware|                         |
|of the adjustment or a   |                         |
|request by the payee for |                         |
|a copy of the note.      |                         |
|If a payment gives rise  |                         |
|to a third party payment |                         |
|adjustment, the payment  |                         |
|cannot also result in an |                         |
|adjustment event under   |                         |
|another provision.       |                         |


Detailed explanation of new law


      7. The amendments create an entitlement to a decreasing adjustment
         where an entity (the payer) makes a monetary payment to a third
         party (the payee) (or offsets an amount of money owed by the payee
         to the payer, or credits an amount of money to the payee's account)
         relating to a thing that the payer has supplied to another entity
         and which the payee subsequently acquires.  To give rise to a
         decreasing adjustment:


                . the supply by the payer must be a taxable supply;


                . the payment must have a connection with the payee's
                  acquisition of the thing (or be in response to, or for the
                  inducement of, the payee's acquisition of the thing); and


                . the payment must not be consideration for a separate
                  supply to the payer.


         [Schedule 1, item 13, subsection 134-5(1)]


      8. The term thing is defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act as
         'anything that can be supplied or imported'.  Accordingly, the
         adjustment may arise for any type of supply, including supplies of
         rights or services. It is necessary though for what the payee
         acquires to be the same thing the payer supplies.  There may be
         some alteration of the thing through the supply chain, or
         incorporation of the thing into a broader supply (for example, the
         thing may be packaged with other goods or services).  But for the
         adjustment to apply, the thing supplied by the payer must be
         capable of being identified as something acquired by the payee.
         [Schedule 1, item 13, subsection 134-5(1)]


      9. The decreasing adjustment is the difference between:


                . the amount of GST payable on the original supply to the
                  other entity (taking into account any other adjustments
                  relating to the supply); and


                . the amount of GST that would have been payable on that
                  supply if the consideration for that supply had been
                  reduced by the amount of the third party payment (and
                  taking into account any other adjustments relating to the
                  supply).


         [Schedule 1, item 13, subsection 134-5(2)]


     10. The amendments create an increasing adjustment for the recipient of
         a third party payment (the payee) in respect of a thing acquired
         from another entity where:


                . the acquisition of that thing was a creditable
                  acquisition;


                . the monetary payment must have a connection with the
                  payee's acquisition of the thing (or be in response to, or
                  for the inducement of, the payee's acquisition of the
                  thing); and


                . the payment is not consideration for a separate supply by
                  the payee.


         [Schedule 1, item 13, subsection 134-10(1)]


     11. The increasing adjustment is the difference between:


                . the amount of input tax credits to which the payee was
                  entitled for its acquisition (taking into account any
                  other adjustments relating to the acquisition); and


                . the amount of input tax credits to which the payee would
                  have been entitled for that acquisition had the
                  consideration for that acquisition been reduced by the
                  amount of the third party payment (and taking into account
                  any other adjustments relating to the acquisition).


         [Schedule 1, item 13, subsection 134-10(2)]


     12. The decreasing adjustments cannot be attributed until the tax
         period in which the payer holds a third party adjustment note.


                . This does not apply to decreasing adjustments not
                  exceeding the adjustment notes threshold (currently $50,
                  increasing to $75 on 1 July 2010).


         [Schedule 1, item 13, section 134-15]


     13. The amendments set out the requirements for third party adjustment
         notes.  The payer is required to give the payee a copy of the third
         party adjustment note within 28 days of the earlier of a request by
         the payee or becoming aware of the adjustment.


                . This does not apply to decreasing adjustments not
                  exceeding the adjustment notes threshold.


     14. The Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner) has the power to
         determine that in the case of a particular third party adjustment
         note a different period may be substituted for 28 days.  The
         provision that such a determination is not a legislative instrument
         is included to assist readers as the determination is not a
         legislative instrument within the meaning of section 5 of the
         Legislative Instruments Act 2003.


     15. The Commissioner also has the power to determine, by a legislative
         instrument, circumstances in which a different period may be
         substituted for 28 days.  A determination made in relation to a
         particular document will override a determination made in relation
         to circumstances.  [Schedule 1, item 13, section 134-20]


     16. An anti-overlap provision specifies that a payment which gives rise
         to an adjustment under Division 134 cannot also give rise to an
         adjustment event.  [Schedule 1, item 13, section 134-25]


      1. :  Retail third party rebate


                Fascam Ltd, a manufacturer, sells a camera to Choice Cameras
                Ltd, a retailer, for $660.  Choice Cameras sells the camera
                to a customer, Irene, for $880 at a time when Fascam is
                offering a cash-back incentive to retail customers to boost
                its sales.  Irene applies for and receives a cash-back
                payment of $110 from Fascam.


                Under section 134-5 Fascam is entitled to a decreasing
                adjustment with regard to the cash-back payment.


                The decreasing adjustment is calculated as follows:


                (A) GST payable on supply to Choice Cameras:


                  A  =  $660  ×  1 / 11  =  $60


                (B) GST which would have been payable had the consideration
                been reduced by the amount of the payment to the payee:


                  B  =  ($660  -  $110)  ×  1 / 11  =  $50


                  A  -  B  =  $60  -  $50  =  $10


                Fascam is entitled to a decreasing adjustment of $10.


                (As the decreasing adjustment is for an amount less than
                $50, Fascam is not required to issue a third party
                adjustment note).


                Choice Cameras is not affected by the decreasing adjustment
                to which Fascam is entitled.  Choice Cameras's GST liability
                remains as follows:


                GST payable on sale  -  input tax credits on acquisition  =
                GST liability:


                  ($880  ×  1 / 11)  -  ($660  ×  1 / 11)  =  $80  -  $60  =
                 $20


                If Irene is registered for GST as a professional
                photographer and has purchased the camera for use in her
                business, the acquisition of the camera is a creditable
                acquisition.  She therefore has an increasing adjustment
                under section 134-10.


                The increasing adjustment is calculated as follows:


                (C) Input tax credit entitlement arising from the
                acquisition from the other entity (Choice Cameras):


                  C  =  $880  ×  1 / 11  =  $80


                (D) Amount of input tax credits to which the payee would
                have been entitled had the consideration for the acquisition
                been reduced by the amounts of the payer's payment:


                  D  =  ($880  -  $110)  ×  1 / 11  =  $70


                  C  -  D  =  $80  -  $70  =  $10


                Irene has an increasing adjustment of $10.  If Irene is not
                registered for GST, this increasing adjustment does not
                arise.


                If Irene is registered for GST but intends to use the camera
                50 per cent for private purposes and 50 per cent for
                creditable purposes she is entitled to an input tax credit
                of 50 per cent of the full input tax credit.


                The increasing adjustment is calculated as follows:


                (C) Input tax credit entitlement arising from the
                acquisition from the other entity (Choice Cameras):


                  C  =  $880  ×  1 / 11  ×  0.50  =  $40


                (D) Amount of input tax credits to which the payee would
                have been entitled had the consideration for the acquisition
                been reduced by the amounts of the payer's payment:


                  D  =  ($880  -  $110)  ×  1 / 11  ×  0.50  =  $35


                  C  -  D  =  $40  -  $35  =  $5


                Irene has an increasing adjustment of $5.


      2. :  Motor vehicle industry holdback payments


                Dealers in new motor vehicles commonly use floor plan
                arrangements to finance their trading stock.  In a typical
                floor plan arrangement, title to the vehicles passes from
                the manufacturer or importer to a finance company and the
                dealer is granted physical possession of the vehicle. This
                allows the dealer to offer the vehicles for sale without
                having to purchase them before securing a customer.  When
                the dealer finds a customer for a vehicle, title to that
                vehicle is supplied by the finance company to the dealer
                immediately before the dealer supplies it to the customer.
                Manufacturers and importers of motor vehicles commonly make
                payments to their dealers known as 'holdback' payments.


                A manufacturer, Manucars, supplies motor vehicles to a
                finance company, Financars, which obtains title to the
                vehicles.  Financars has a floor plan arrangement with a
                dealer, Dealacars, that covers the vehicles it acquires from
                Manucars.  The arrangement allows Dealacars to display the
                vehicles for sale to its customers.  A wholesale holdback
                payment will be credited to Dealacars' account by Manucars
                when Manucars invoices Financars for a particular vehicle.


                Dealacars orders a vehicle from Manucars on behalf of
                Financars.  Manucars supplies the vehicle to Financars and
                invoices Financars for $22,000 (including GST).  Title in
                the vehicle passes from Manucars to Financars and Dealacars
                obtains physical possession of the vehicle.


                A wholesale holdback payment of $5,500 is credited to
                Dealacars' account by Manucars because Manucars has invoiced
                a specific motor vehicle to Financars.  The arrangement
                looks like this:


         [pic]


                Manucars attributed GST of $2,000 in relation to the supply
                of the car to Financars.  It has a decreasing adjustment in
                relation to the holdback payment to Dealacars.


                The decreasing adjustment is calculated as follows:


                (A) GST payable on supply to Financars:


                  A  =  $22,000  ×  1 / 11  =  $2,000


                (B) GST which would have been payable had the consideration
                been reduced by the amount of the payment to the payee:


                  B  =  ($22,000  -  $5,500)  ×  1 / 11  =  $1,500


                  A  -  B  =  $2,000  -  $1,500  =  $500


                Dealacars has a corresponding increasing adjustment of $500.


                Financars does not have any adjustment in relation to the
                holdback payment.


         Example 1.3:  Third party rebate involving computer software


                A software developer, LangtonSoft, has developed a
                specialised accounting software package. It enters into an
                agreement with an online retailer of computer software,
                GaremaSoft, to supply its software to Australian customers
                and provides GaremaSoft with all of the necessary codes to
                effect these sales.  The arrangements involve GaremaSoft
                acquiring from LangtonSoft the licence to each software
                package for $440, and selling that licence to its customers.
                 GaremaSoft is not acting as an agent.


                After a year, LangtonSoft decides to offer a cash rebate of
                $110 to any Australian firm that buys the software.


                An Australian firm, Lam and Co, purchases the accounting
                software from GaremaSoft's website for $660.  The tax
                invoice GaremaSoft issues shows GST payable of $60.


                Lam and Co applies for the $110 rebate and LangtonSoft pays
                it.


                Lam and Co acquires the right to use the software, which
                LangtonSoft supplied.  LangtonSoft will have a decreasing
                adjustment of $10 under Division 134.  If Lam and Co
                acquires the rights of use of the software for a sole or
                partly creditable purpose, it will have an increasing
                adjustment under Division 134.


Application and transitional provisions


     17. Third party payment adjustments will apply to payments made on or
         after 1 July 2010.


Consequential amendments


     18. As a consequence of the inclusion of Division 134, amendments have
         been made to:


                . paragraph 19-40(c) to ensure the corrected GST amount
                  includes adjustments resulting from the new Division 134;


                . paragraph 19-45(c) to ensure the previously attributed GST
                  amounts include decreasing adjustments arising from the
                  new Division 134;


                . paragraph 19-70(2)(a) to ensure the corrected input tax
                  credit amount includes adjustments resulting from the new
                  Division 134;


                . paragraph 19-75(b) to ensure the previously attributed
                  input tax credit amounts include increasing adjustments
                  arising from the new Division 134;


                . section 54-50 to apply the requirements of this section to
                  third party adjustment notes required under the new
                  Division 134;


                . section 129-80 to include adjustments arising from the new
                  Division 134 in the calculation of adjustments under this
                  section;


                . section 131-55 to include adjustments arising from the new
                  Division 134 in the calculation of the amount of
                  increasing adjustment under this section;


                . Division 153 to ensure that the rules in that Division
                  regarding the provision of adjustments notes by principals
                  and agents apply to the provision of third party
                  adjustment notes;


                . subsection 8J(10) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953
                  (TAA 1953) to include third party adjustment notes in the
                  list of statements made in relation to a tax law that are
                  made to a person other than a taxation officer;


                . section 288-45 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 to include
                  third party adjustment notes required by the new Division
                  134 in the provisions applying a penalty for failing to
                  issue an adjustment note; and


                . section 288-50 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 to include
                  third party adjustment notes in the provisions applying a
                  penalty where principal and agent both issue tax invoices
                  and adjustment notes.






Chapter 2
Attribution of input tax credits

Outline of chapter


     19. Schedule 2 to this Bill amends the goods and services tax (GST) law
         to clarify the rules in the GST law for attributing input tax
         credits to tax periods.


Context of amendments


Attribution of input tax credits


    20. The rules for attributing input tax credits to particular tax
        periods play an important role in the operation of the GST.  The A
        New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) provides
        that input tax credits (including reduced input tax credits) are
        attributable to the first tax period in which either any
        consideration is provided by the recipient, or an invoice is
        issued.  If the taxpayer accounts on a cash basis, input tax
        credits will only be attributable when and to the extent that the
        recipient provides consideration.


    21. Two exceptions exist to this basic rule.  Firstly, input tax
        credits cannot be attributed to a tax period unless a relevant tax
        invoice is held by the taxpayer in that tax period.  Such input tax
        credits will instead be attributable to the first tax period in
        which the taxpayer holds a tax invoice (see subsection 29-10(3) of
        the GST Act).  Secondly, if the GST return for a tax period does
        not take into account an otherwise attributable input tax credit,
        the input tax credit is not attributable to that tax period.  Such
        credits are attributable to the first tax period in which a return
        is provided taking the credit into account (see subsection 29-10(4)
        of the GST Act).


    22. Concerns have been expressed by taxpayers that the way the latter
        exception is expressed in the law may be ambiguous and is open to
        an argument that it applies only to a limited category of input tax
        credits.


Summary of new law


     23. This Schedule amends the present rules for attributing input tax
         credits.  These amendments clarify that taxpayers are able to defer
         the attribution of input tax credits, subject to the four-year
         restriction on claiming input tax credits contained in Schedule 1
         to the Tax Laws Amendment (2009 GST Administration Measures) Bill
         2009.


     24. This amendment addresses concerns by taxpayers that the present
         attribution rules may not give this outcome in all situations.


Comparison of key features of new law and current law

|New law                  |Current law              |
|Input tax credits cease  |Input tax credits cease  |
|to be attributable to a  |to be attributable to a  |
|particular tax period    |particular tax period    |
|when they are not taken  |when they are not taken  |
|into account in the GST  |into account in the GST  |
|return for that period.  |return for that period.  |
|Instead, the credits will|Instead, the credits will|
|be attributable to the   |be attributable to the   |
|first tax period in which|first tax period in which|
|they are taken into      |they are taken into      |
|account in a return where|account in a return where|
|the taxpayer holds a tax |a tax invoice is held by |
|invoice.                 |the taxpayer.  However,  |
|This is subject to the   |concerns have been       |
|four-year restriction on |expressed about the      |
|claiming input tax       |effectiveness of the     |
|credits contained in     |legislation in achieving |
|Schedule 1 to the Tax    |this outcome in all      |
|Laws Amendment (2009 GST |cases.                   |
|Administration Measures) |This is subject to the   |
|Bill 2009.               |four-year restriction on |
|                         |claiming input tax       |
|                         |credits contained in     |
|                         |Schedule 1 to the Tax    |
|                         |Laws Amendment (2009 GST |
|                         |Administration Measures) |
|                         |Bill 2009.               |


Detailed explanation of new law


Clarification of the input tax credit attribution rules


     25. The amendments clarify the attribution rules for input tax credits
         contained in subsection 29-10(4) of the GST Act.


     26. Subsection 29-10(4) was introduced in 2000 to enable taxpayers to
         attribute input tax credits to tax periods after the period in
         which they first held a tax invoice.  The effect of this measure
         was to permit taxpayers to claim input tax credits in the current
         business activity statement (BAS) rather than revising a BAS for an
         earlier tax period.


     27. Since the introduction of the measure, some taxpayers have
         expressed concern that the specific reference in subsection 29-
         10(4) to an earlier paragraph in the attribution rules (paragraph
         29-10(3)(b)) may leave unclear the application of the provision to
         input tax credits not falling within this earlier paragraph.


     28. This amendment resolves this ambiguity by revising subsection 29-
         10(4) to remove any reference to other provisions.  [Schedule 2,
         item 1, subsection 29-10(4)]


Application and transitional provisions


     29. These amendments will apply in relation to net amounts for tax
         periods commencing on or after 1 July 2010.



Index

Schedule 1:  Adjustments for third party payments

|Bill reference                              |Paragraph     |
|                                            |number        |
|Item 13, subsection 134-5(1)                |1.7, 1.8      |
|Item 13, subsection 134-5(2)                |1.9           |
|Item 13, subsection 134-10(1)               |1.10          |
|Item 13, subsection 134-10(2)               |1.11          |
|Item 13, section 134-15                     |1.11          |
|Item 13, section 134-20                     |1.15          |
|Item 13, section 134-25                     |1.16          |


Schedule 2:  Attribution of input tax credits

|Bill reference                              |Paragraph     |
|                                            |number        |
|Item 1, subsection 29-10(4)                 |2.10          |



Do not remove section break.




 


[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]