[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]
2004-2005 The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES THERAPEUTIC GOODS AMENDMENT BILL 2005 SUPPLEMENTARY EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Amendments to be moved on behalf of the Government (Circulated by authority of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Health and Ageing)Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]Therapeutic Goods Amendment Bill 2005 OUTLINE The Therapeutic Goods Amendment Bill 2005 (the Bill) introduces additional enforcement measures to enhance the Therapeutic Goods Administration's (TGA) ability to secure better compliance with the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act), so that public health and safety will be adequately protected. In particular, the Bill introduces civil penalty provisions as an alternative sanction to criminal sanctions for a number of breaches under the Act. In most cases, the civil penalty provisions apply to breaches under the Act that also attract a parallel criminal offence. The Bill currently provides a separate warrant process for obtaining evidence for a breach of a civil penalty provision. The process of obtaining warrants for securing evidence in relation to civil penalty contraventions mirrors the current arrangements in the Act for obtaining evidence in relation to offences. The powers that can be exercised under a warrant to investigate and secure evidential material in relation to civil penalty contraventions also mirror those available under a warrant to investigate and secure evidential material in relation to criminal offences under the Act. In applying for a warrant to investigate a civil penalty contravention, the requirements that have to be met before a Magistrate may issue a warrant is the same as that applying in relation to an application for a warrant to investigate a possible criminal offence. When applying for either warrant, officers concerned are required to provide information on oath to satisfy the Magistrate that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that there may be evidence to establish a breach of the Act or Regulations. Any evidence obtained under either class of warrant must in turn meet evidentiary requirements before it is admissible before the relevant Court. Following consultations with stakeholders where it was suggested that a single warrants process to obtain evidence for breaches of the Act or the Regulations may be more effective and efficient, it is proposed that amendments to the entry, searches and warrants provisions of the Bill be made to establish a single process for applying to a Magistrate for a warrant to investigate and secure evidence of any breach of the Act or the Regulations. This will allow material obtained under the search and seizure warrant to be used as evidence either in a criminal or civil proceeding. FINANCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT The proposed amendments are not expected to have any significant financial impact on Commonwealth expenditure or revenue. 2
NOTES ON AMENDMENTS Amendment 1 Item 131 of the Bill will be amended to replace the words "within the meaning of paragraph (a) of the definition of that expression" with the words "in respect of an offence against the Act, in respect of a contravention of a civil penalty provision or in respect of both". Item 131 of the Bill as it currently stands amends subsection 47(1) of the Act to make it clear that the powers under that provision may only be exercised to obtain evidential material relating to the commission of an offence under the Act. This amendment was necessary to take into account that parallel powers were created under new section 47A to enable evidentiary material to be obtained to establish breaches of the new civil penalty provisions. The inclusion of separate powers to obtain evidentiary material for different purposes was necessary to reflect that the Bill inserted a separate warrants process (proposed new section 51AA) to enable evidentiary material to be collected to establish breaches of civil penalty provisions, as distinct from the collection of evidentiary material to establish the commission of offences. The effect of the proposed amendment to Item 131 is to enable the powers under section 47 to be exercised for the purposes of obtaining evidential material to establish either the commission of an offence, or a breach of a civil penalty provision, or both, to reflect that a single warrants process will be introduced by the government amendments. Subject to the limitations provided under subsections 47(2) and (3) of the Act, if an authorised person has reasonable grounds for suspecting that there may be evidential material in respect of an offence or a civil penalty contravention, or in respect of both, on any premises, the authorised person may: (a) enter the premises; (b) search and inspect premises; (c) seize goods; and (d) exercise other powers under subsection 48(1) of the Act. Amendment 2 As a consequence of Amendment 1, the heading of section 47A is altered by adding at the end "and civil penalty provisions". Amendment 3 The effect of amendment 3 is to omit the restriction placed on an authorised person to exercise the powers under section 47 only for the purposes of securing evidence for a criminal offence, so that an authorised person may exercised any of the powers under that section for the purposes of securing evidence to establish the commission of an offence, or a breach of a civil penalty provision, or both. Amendment 4 Item 133 of the Bill as it currently stands inserts new section 47A, which provides search and seizure powers to secure of evidential material in respect of a contravention of a civil penalty 3
provision. These new powers take into account the separate search and seizure warrants processes. Section 47A mirrors the current section 47 of the Act relating to entry and seizure powers of authorised persons for the purposes of obtaining evidence in respect of an offence against the Act. However, now that a single search and seizure warrant process is proposed, section 47A is no longer necessary. Item 133 of the Bill is therefore proposed to be omitted. Similarly, Items 134 and 135 of the Bill are redundant and are proposed to be omitted. Amendment 4 also inserts a new Item 133 which will extend the operation of subsection 47(4) of the Act to take into account the civil penalty provisions inserted by the Bill. The effect of the proposed amendment is to enable any other evidential material that may be uncovered during the course of searching premises to be seized if the authorised person believes on reasonable grounds that it may otherwise be lost, concealed or destroyed or may be used either to commit, continue or repeat either an offence, or a breach of a civil penalty provision. Amendment 5 This amendment makes a consequential amendment to section 48C (which relates to the use of electronic equipment at premises) to make it clear that this section will apply to evidential material in respect of an offence against the Act or a contravention of a civil penalty provision or in respect of both. Amendment 6 Item 138 of the Bill as it currently stands amends paragraphs 48J(2)(a) and (b) to make it clear that the Magistrate may allow an authorised person to continue to retain seized evidential material for a period of up to 3 years in certain circumstances. The evidential material that the Magistrate may allow to be retained is in respect of the commission of a criminal offence obtained under an offence related warrant. Similarly, the evidential material that a Magistrate may allow to be retained in respect of a breach of a civil penalty provision is evidential material obtained under a warrant obtained to investigate breaches of civil penalty provision . The amendment proposed under new Item 138 takes into account the single warrants process and the exercise of the same powers that will be permitted to secure evidence to establish either the commission of an offence or a breach of a civil penalty provision, or both, and will allow a magistrate to permit the evidence obtained under the original warrant to be retained for the purposes of criminal or civil proceedings, or both, beyond the initial period permitted by that warrant. Item 139 of the Bill is also proposed to be omitted. As it is proposed to merge the offence related warrants process and the civil penalty warrants process into a single warrants process under section 50 of the Act, the proposed amendments under Item 139 that effectively limits the application of the warrant under section 50 of the Act to evidential material obtained in respect of an offence against the Act is no longer required. Instead, a new Item 139 is proposed which amends subsection 50(2) of the Act to allow the Magistrate to issue a warrant, if the Magistrate is satisfied by information on oath that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that there is, or there may be, in or on the premises, evidential material in respect of an offence against the Act, in respect of a contravention of a civil penalty, or in respect of both. The warrant issued by the Magistrate could therefore allow an authorised 4
person to obtain evidence in respect of any offence under the Act, in respect of any contravention of a civil penalty provision or in respect of both. This is necessary to take into account amongst other things, that a number of breaches of the Act attract both an offence and a civil penalty. Item 140 of the Bill is proposed to be omitted to take into account the introduction of a single warrants process under section 50 of the Act. Therefore the amendments proposing the insertion of a new civil penalty contravention warrants process under new section 51AA is no longer required. The headings to sections 50 and 51 of the Act are also proposed to be altered by inserting "and civil penalty provision after "Offence" to reflect that warrants that may be obtained under those sections may be for the investigation of, and securing of evidence in relation to, the commission of any offence, or any contravention of a civil penalty provision, or both. 5