Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


COMMUNICATIONS AND THE ARTS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000


1998-1999-2000



THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA



HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES







COMMUNICATIONS AND THE ARTS
LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000






EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM














(Circulated by authority of the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Senator the Hon. Richard Alston)

ISBN: 0642 454388

COMMUNICATIONS AND THE ARTS
LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000
OUTLINE

The Communications and the Arts Legislation Amendment Bill 2000 (the Bill) makes a series of minor administrative and consequential amendments to:
§ the Public Lending Right Act 1985;
§ the Telecommunications Act 1997;
§ the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999; and
§ the Trade Practices Act 1974.

Public Lending Right Act 1985 Amendments


The Public Lending Right Act 1985 (the PLR Act) provides the legislative framework for the Public Lending Right (PLR) Scheme. PLR is a cultural program that makes payments to eligible Australian creators and publishers in recognition that income is lost from the free multiple use of their books in public lending libraries. PLR also has a broader cultural objective whereby the existence of the scheme encourages the creation of books by Australians and the publication of books in Australia. For the purposes of the Act, a Public Lending Right Committee is appointed by the Minister to administer the PLR Scheme.

A recent evaluation of the PLR Scheme examined the efficiency and effectiveness of the Scheme. While the Review Committee found the scheme to be effective and efficient, it made a number of recommendations to strengthen the objectives of the scheme and streamline and update operational procedures of the program.

This Bill implements the evaluation recommendation that a statement of objectives of the Scheme be incorporated into the PLR Act. The other minor amendments to the PLR Act change the definition of prescribed persons to more accurately reflect the objectives of the Act, remove the references in the PLR Act to beneficiaries as prescribed persons, and clarify the process of making final payments in respect of deceased creators.

Telecommunications Act 1997 amendments

The Bill will amend the Telecommunications Act 1997 (the TA) to provide carriers and carriage service providers (CSPs) with immunity in certain emergency situations and when required to comply with a designated disaster plan. An immunity for carriers and CSPs already exists in section 313 of the TA when assisting with law enforcement and in certain other situations. The amendments in this Bill ensure that a similar immunity is extended to carriers and CSPs in emergency situations and when complying with designated disaster plans.

Section 315 of the Act provides that a senior police officer may request CSPs to suspend the supply of a carriage service in an emergency situation. The Bill will ensure that a CSP will not be liable for damages as a result of compliance with such a request.

Similarly, sections 344 to 346 of the TA provide for licence conditions and service provider rules to require carriers and CSPs to comply with designated disaster plans prepared by the Commonwealth, State or Territory. The Bill will ensure that carriers and CSPs will not be liable for damages as a result of compliance with designated disaster plans.

Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 amendments


The minor amendment to the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 substitutes an Australian Business Number (ABN) for an Australian Company Number (ACN) reference, for the Telecomunications Industry Ombudsman Limited. This is consistent with the Government’s policy to make the ABN the single business identifier for Commonwealth purposes.

Trade Practices Act 1974 amendments

The Bill makes three amendments to the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA).

The amendments fix an anomaly in the TPA so as to enable the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to issue an advisory notice at the same time as it issues a Part A competition notice, rather than at the time the competition notice comes into effect. The advisory notice provides guidance on how the recipient might change its conduct so it is no longer anti-competitive. The amendments will thus enable the ACCC to give earlier guidance and may lead to more rapid modification of anti-competitive conduct, possibly before a notice comes into force.

Under the TPA, the ACCC must monitor and report on specified telecommunications charges paid by customers and on compliance by carriers and CSPs with the universal service obligation (USO). The Bill updates a reference in the TPA from the Telecommunications Act 1997 to the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999, which now covers regulation of USO charges. The Bill also requires the ACCC to monitor and report on each digital service provider’s compliance with the digital data service obligation in the same way it monitors and reports on compliance with the USO.

The third amendment to the TPA makes minor changes to the processes by which the ACCC exercises procedural functions in an access arbitration. These amendments will improve the efficiency with which the ACCC can progress access arbitrations under Part XIC of the TPA by enabling a nominated member of the ACCC as constituted for the arbitration, rather than all the members, to exercise the procedural powers. The Bill will eliminate undue delay caused by the temporary absence of a member, improving the efficiency of the arbitration process. Procedural powers cover such matters as calling for submissions or taking evidence, and do not include the ability to make, vary or revoke determinations or give draft determinations.

FINANCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT

The Bill will not have any financial impact on Commonwealth revenue or expenditure.

NOTES ON CLAUSES

Clause 1 – Short title

Clause 1 provides for the citation of the Communications and the Arts Legislation Amendment Act 2000.

Clause 2 – Commencement

The Act will commence on Royal Assent.

Clause 3 – Schedule(s)

By virtue of this clause, provisions of the Public Lending Right Act 1985 (the PLR Act), the Telecommunications Act 1997 (the TA), the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 (the TCPSS Act) and the Trade Practices Act 1974 (the TPA) are amended or repealed as set out in Schedule 1 to the Bill, and any other item has effect according to its terms.

Clause 4 – Application provision – Public Lending Right Scheme


This clause provides that the amendments to the PLR Act contained in Schedule 1 to the Bill will only relate to claims made after the commencement of this Act. This means that the amendments in the Bill will not have any retrospective application.

Clause 5 – Application provision – immunity of carriers and carriage service providers

This clause provides that the amendments of the TA which relate to carrier and carriage service provider immunity (see items 6 and 7 of Schedule 1) apply to acts or omissions occurring after the commencement of this Act. This means that any acts or omissions which occurred before the commencement of this Act will not attract statutory immunity.

Clause 6 – Saving of notices


This is a transitional provision to ensure that advisory notices made under subsection 151AQB(2) of the TPA which are in force before this Act commences remain in force notwithstanding the repeal of that subsection (see discussion at item 9 of Schedule 1).

SCHEDULE 1 – AMENDMENTS

Public Lending Right Act 1985

Item 1 – New section 2A – Objects of Act

This item inserts a new section which is a statement of the objects of the Public Lending Right Act 1985 (the PLR Act). The item sets out two objects of the PLR Act. The first, in new paragraph 2A(a) is to make payments to Australian creators of books (wherever they are resident) and publishers of books in Australia in recognition of lost income from their books being available for use in public lending libraries in Australia. The second, in new paragraph 2A(b), is to support the enrichment of Australian culture by encouraging the creation of books by Australians and the publication of books in Australia.

As originally enacted, the PLR Act did not include a statement as to the objects of the Act. In its report titled “Evaluation of the Public Lending Right Scheme”(1999), the Public Lending Right Scheme Evaluation Steering Committee recommended that the purposes of the PLR Act are much broader than simply providing recompense for lost income and that this should be explicitly stated in the legislation. This amendment, therefore, seeks to redress an omission in the original enactment.

Item 2 – Subsection 5(4)

This item clarifies that the term “prescribed person” means any of the persons listed in subsection 5(4). Pursuant to subsection 5(2), the Public Lending Right Scheme may only provide for payments to be made to a “prescribed person”.

Item 3 – Paragraph 5(4)(b)

This item removes from the definition of “prescribed person” the widow, widower or child of a deceased Australian author, or a person having a relationship or association with the deceased author of a kind specified in the Public Lending Right Scheme. The objectives of the PLR Act are to make payments to creators and publishers of books and it is considered inconsistent with those objectives to allow the Scheme to include payments for specific family members of authors in their own right other than in limited circumstances.

Section 26 of the PLR Act provides that where a person is to receive a payment under the Scheme and the payment has not been made at the date of death of that person, the payment is to be made to their legal personal representative. As section 26 provides for payment to the legal personal representative where the creator has died, it is appropriate to remove the persons listed in paragraph 5(4)(b) and rely on section 26 in those circumstances. Nothing in section 26 prevents the Scheme from limiting the number of payments to be made to the legal personal representative after the death of the creator.

Item 4 – Paragraph 5(4)(c)

This item omits from paragraph 5(4)(c) the words “or otherwise contributed to its form or contents”. The purpose of this amendment is to limit this category of “prescribed persons” to Australian persons who illustrated, translated, compiled or edited the book and remove the uncertainty associated with determining other forms of contribution. This item clarifies that the category is intended to cover those who made an intellectual contribution to the creation of a book and is not intended for persons who make other contributions.

Item 5 – Paragraph 5(4)(d)

This item removes from the definition of “prescribed person” the widow, widower or child of an Australian person who illustrated, translated, compiled or edited the book or otherwise contributed to its form or contents and who has died. The purpose of this item is the same as that in relation to items 3 and 4.

Telecommunications Act 1997


Item 6 – New subsections 315(3A) and (3B) – carriage service provider immunity

Section 315 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (the TA) provides that a senior police officer may request a carriage service provider to suspend the supply of the carriage service in an emergency. Subsection 315(1) of the TA sets out the circumstances that constitute an emergency for the purpose of suspending supply. They include if a senior police officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an individual with access to a particular carriage service has threatened to kill or seriously injure another person and the suspension of the service is reasonably necessary to prevent the threat from being made again.

A carriage service provider may comply with such a request but is not bound to (subsection 315(2)). There is a concern that a carriage service provider may be reluctant to comply with such a request for fear of legal action from the person whose service was suspended.

Subsections 313(5) and (6) of the TA already provide immunity to carriers, carriage service providers and their officers, employees and agents for actions carried out in good faith to assist Government in the performance of duties as outlined in subsection 313(3) (namely, enforcing the criminal law and laws imposing pecuniary penalties, protecting the public revenue and safeguarding national security). As a court may find that this immunity does not automatically apply to section 315, the proposed amendments remove any doubt that carriage service providers acting under good faith in compliance with a request under subsection 315(1) are covered by a statutory immunity.

Proposed new subsections 315(3A) and (3B) will specifically provide a statutory immunity to a carriage service provider and an officer, employee or agent of the provider for an action or other proceedings for damages for an act done or an omission made in good faith in compliance with a request under subsection 315(1) to suspend supply of the carriage service in an emergency.

Immunity provisions are necessary to protect a carriage service provider to ensure that they are not liable in damages for acting in good faith to suspend supply in an emergency, and to ensure that carriage service providers are not discouraged from complying with a request to suspend supply. This statutory immunity would not be absolute. It would only apply in relation to a carriage service provider’s compliance with a request under subsection 315(1).

Item 7 – New section 346A – Carrier and carriage service provider immunity


Sections 344 to 346 of the TA enable licence conditions and service provider determinations to require carriers and carriage service providers to comply with designated disaster plans prepared by the Commonwealth, or a State or Territory.

There is a concern that compliance with a designated disaster plan, in accordance with a licence condition or a service provider determination, could leave a carrier or carriage service provider open to legal action.

New section 346A provides a statutory immunity to a carrier and a carriage service provider and an officer, employee or agent of the carrier or provider for an act or other proceedings for damages for an act done or an omission made in good faith in compliance with a designated diaster plan which they are required to comply with as part of a licence condition or a service provider determination.

Immunity provisions are necessary to protect a carrier or carriage service provider to ensure that they are not liable in damages for acting in good faith in compliance with legal obligations under designated disaster plans.

This statutory immunity would not be absolute. It would only apply in relation to the carrier’s or carriage service provider’s compliance with a designated disaster plan.

Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999

Item 8 – Subsection 128(3) – ABN number

This proposed amendment substitutes a reference to the Australian Company Number (ACN) of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Limited with the new Australian Business Number (ABN). This is consistent with the Government’s policy to make the ABN the single business identifier for Commonwealth purposes.

Trade Practices Act 1974


Item 9 – New subsections 151AQB(1) and (2) - Advisory notices

Section 151AQB of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (the TPA) enables the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to give an advisory notice to a recipient of a competition notice. The advisory notice provides guidance as to how the notice recipient might change its conduct so it is no longer anti-competitive. Currently, section 151AQB only allows an advisory notice to be issued once a competition notice comes into effect. In some instances a competition notice will not come not effect immediately upon issue. In such instances the current wording of section 151AQB would not enable the ACCC to issue an advisory notice until after the competition notice is in force.

It is preferable, however, that the ACCC have the power to issue an advisory notice at the same time as the competition notice is issued as it would enable the ACCC to give earlier guidance on how conduct might be modified and may lead to quicker modification of offending conduct.

The proposed new subsection 151AQB(1) replaces the current subsections 151AQB(1) and (2) and provides that an advisory notice may be issued at the same time as a competition notice or at any time after the competition notice has been issued. This addresses the anomaly in the current subsection 151AQB which does not enable an advisory notice to be issued until after a competition notice comes into force.

Item 10 – Subsection 151AQB(3)

This is a consequential amendment necessary as a result of amendments to section 151AQB (see above discussion at item 9). It replaces a reference to ‘A notice under subsection (2)’ with a reference to ‘An advisory notice’.

Item 11 – Subsection 151AQB(4)

This is a consequential amendment necessary as a result of amendments to section 151AQB (see above discussion at item 9). It replaces a reference to ‘A notice under subsection (2)’ with a reference to ‘An advisory notice’.

Item 12 – Subsection 151AQB(5)

This is a consequential amendment necessary as a result of amendments to section 151AQB (see above discussion at item 9). It replaces a reference to ‘a notice under subsection (2)’ with a reference to ‘an advisory notice’.

Item 13 – Subsection 151AQB(6)

This is a consequential amendment necessary as a result of amendments to section 151AQB (see above discussion at item 9). It replaces a reference to ‘a notice under subsection (2)’ with a reference to ‘an advisory notice’.

Item 14 – Subsection 151AQB(7)

This is a consequential amendment necessary as a result of amendments to section 151AQB (see above discussion at item 9). It replaces a reference to ‘a notice under subsection (2)’ with a reference to ‘an advisory notice’.

Item 15 – Subsection 151AQB(7)

This is a consequential amendment necessary as a result of amendments to section 151AQB (see above discussion at item 9). It replaces a reference to ‘the notice under subsection (2)’ with a reference to ‘the advisory notice’.

Item 16 – Paragraph 151CM(1)(c)

Section 151CM of the TPA requires the ACCC to monitor and report on specified telecommunications charges paid by consumers. Paragraph 151CM(1)(c) currently requires the ACCC to monitor the adequacy of each universal service provider’s compliance with Division 5 of Part 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 which previously dealt with the regulation of universal services charges. The regulation of universal services charges is now dealt with in Division 11 of Part 2 of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999, as a result of amendments made to that Act by the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Amendment Act (No. 2) 2000.

The proposed amendment replaces the incorrect reference to Division 5 of Part 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 with the correct reference to Division 11 of Part 2 of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999.

Item 17 - New paragraph 151CM(1)(d)

The proposed amendment includes an additional paragraph requiring the ACCC to monitor and report to the Minister on the adequacy of each digital data service provider’s compliance with its obligations under Division 12 of Part 2 of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 (the TCPSS Act) which deals with the regulation of digital data service charges.

This amendment was intended to be introduced by item 18 of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment Act 1999. However, due to technical anomalies relating to the date of operation of various provisions of this Act, these amendments were not made.

Subsequent amendments to the TCPSS Act by the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Amendment Act (No. 2) 2000 have meant that the correct reference to the Division dealing with the regulation of digital data service charges is now Division 12 of Part 2 of the TCPSS Act, not Division 5A of Part 2 of the TCPSS Act, as originally set out in item 18 of Schedule 4 to the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment Act 1999.

Item 18 - New section 152CWA – Exercise of procedural powers by Commission members

Subdivision D of Division 8 of Part XIC of the TPA deals with the procedures of the ACCC for the purposes of resolving telecommunications access disputes. For the purposes of an arbitration the ACCC is to be constituted by 2 or more members of the ACCC nominated in writing by the Chairperson (subsection 152CV(1) of the TPA).

The ACCC is given specified powers for the purposes of arbitrating the access dispute. For example, it may take evidence on oath, summons witnesses, make a confidentiality order and refer matters to an expert (see sections 152DC and 152DD of the TPA).

Currently these powers may only be exercised by the ACCC, as constituted for the purposes of the arbitration. To increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the access arbitrations it is proposed to enable an individual sitting member to exercise ‘procedural powers’ in certain circumstances. This will remove the current difficulty where the ACCC cannot exercise ‘procedural powers’ where a sitting member is absent or is not available, without reconstituting the ACCC for the purposes of the arbitration.

The proposed amendments enable the Chairperson, or a sitting member nominated by the Chairperson to exercise the ‘procedural powers’ of the ACCC in relation to the arbitration.

Proposed new subsection 152CWA(1) deals with when the Chairperson of the ACCC is part of the arbitration. In this case the ‘procedural powers’ may be exercised by either the Chairperson, or a sitting member nominated by the Chairperson, or both.

Proposed new subsection 152CWA(2) deals with when the Chairperson is not part of the arbitration. In this case the ‘procedural powers’ may be exercised by either the presiding member of the arbitration (as nominated by the Chairperson under subsection 152CW(2) of the TPA), or another sitting member nominated by the Chairperson, or both.

‘Procedural power’ is defined in proposed new subsection 152CWA(3) to exclude a power conferred by Division 8 of Part XIC of the TPA to make, vary or revoke a determination or a power conferred by this Division to give a draft determination.

This means that a nominated member may make a confidentiality order or summons witnesses without needing to call together all arbitration members of the ACCC. However, an individual member will not be able to make, vary or revoke a determination or to give a draft determination. These powers have been excluded from the definition of ‘procedural powers’ as they go beyond the exercise of a merely procedural power and should be properly exercised by the members of the arbitration as a whole.

 


[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]