Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series |
Last Updated: 27 September 2013
Free Scholarship: Developing a National Legal Scholarship Library
Graham Greenleaf, University of New South
Wales
Philip Chung, University of New South Wales
Andrew Mowbray,
University of Technology, Sydney
This paper is available for download at
Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2326788
Citation
This paper may be referenced as [2013] UNSWLRS 60.
Abstract
This article considers how a country’s legal
scholarship can become a major resource on a free access legal information
institute
(LII), and the relationship of such a national facility to global
legal scholarship facilities such as SSRN’s Legal Scholarship
Network
(LSN) and Google Scholar. It commences with an analysis of the attractions of
those global services to authors and users,
and by comparison what advantages a
nationally-focused scholarship facility can provide. The initial conclusion is
that a combination
of the two could be the most desirable result for both users
and authors. 'Open content' is distinguished from 'free access,' and
it is
argued that the latter is more important than the former to the public interest
in access to scholarship.
AustLII's development since 2008 of the
'Australasian Legal Scholarship Library' is explained. The current version
(Stage 1) includes
about 55,000 searchable items of free access Australasian
legal scholarship in 93 databases (over 100 if law reform databases are
counted). The Library includes law journals (most back to their first issues);
law school research repositories; judicial scholarship;
law texts from open
content publishers; and law thesis abstracts. It may be the Internet’s
second largest national free access
collection of legal scholarship, after the
US collection in the SSRN/LSN). It also includes the LawCite citator, which
automatically
tracks citation of scholarship in the case law on AustLII and on
all LIIs with which AustLII cooperates.
From 2013-14 the Library is to
be expanded (Stage 2) to at least 100,000 searchable items, and improved
technically, with research
infrastructure funding from the Australian Research
Council. In addition to expansion of existing categories, digitised historical
law texts and law reform reports are being added. The article considers how the
Library Stage 2 must be re-conceptualised in light
of what is provided by global
legal scholarship services, and the ongoing relationship with such services
which is desirable in the
interests of its authors and users. Matters discussed
include approaches to permissions, collaboration with commercial publishers
and
other repositories, and proposed technical enhancements such as ‘AustLII
authors pages’, metrics (citation and usage)
for each item of scholarship,
and for each law journal, improved feedback mechanisms to authors and readers,
and similarity-based
searching.
The article concludes with an assessment
of the factors in the Australian context that have been most conducive to the
Library’s
development so far. While not all of these may be replicated
elsewhere (eg numerous law-school-published journals; research infrastructure
funding), most elements are not jurisdiction-specific (or have analogs), and
therefore may be of broader relevance.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLRS/2013/60.html