Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Legal Education Review |
TEACHING NOTE
TEACHING CRIMINAL LAW IN A VISUALLY
AND TECHNOLOGY ORIENTED CULTURE: A VISUAL PEDAGOGY APPROACH
JULIAN HERMIDA*
I INTRODUCTION
The revolution in media and global communications in
the last few decades has transformed the very basic foundations of knowledge
and
education.1 Pedagogical authors have been advocating
for the development of media literacy across the
curriculum.2 However, in Canada the Law School
classroom, with its teaching philosophy built during an exclusively
print-centred era,3 has not yet opened its doors to
audiovisual teaching methodologies or to media
literacy.4
The objective of this article is to
describe some student-centred activities that are informed by visual pedagogy,
and that take into
account students’ learning styles in a visually
oriented and technology driven society. It is written exclusively from a
Canadian
perspective and it is premised on the fact that teaching methods that
use the structure, language, and rhythm of audiovisual media
attract
students’ attention and encourage their active involvement in
class.5 Furthermore, approaching criminal law from this
perspective helps students develop media literacy as advocated by visual
pedagogy.
For this purpose, the article firstly discusses the existing clash
between the prevailing Law School teaching philosophy in Canada
and the
audiovisual culture in which we are all immersed. Secondly, it briefly examines
Goldfarb’s visual pedagogy, which calls
for both adopting teaching
methodologies compatible with the contemporary audiovisual paradigm and
developing students’ media
literacy in the classroom, ie, a
students’ analysis of media texts and students’ media production
across the school curriculum.6 Thirdly, it analyses the
context of the course in which the activities are inserted. Finally, it examines
some teaching activities
involving the analysis of video scenes showing criminal
events and students’ production of videos dealing with criminal
matters.
II CLASH BETWEEN PREVAILING LAW SCHOOL TEACHING PHILOSOPHY AND AUDIOVISUAL CULTURE
Since the 1980s, Canadian Law Schools have been
gradually shifting the conception of the law from a unitary, doctrine-focused,
and
homogeneous system to a more diversified, open, and plural process, where
there is a relatively higher degree of tolerance for alternative
perspectives
and for the contribution of other disciplines.7
Although this change in the legal paradigm implied a devaluation of the
importance of Langdell’s case method, and despite the
efforts of many
faculty members and authors in Canada, law teaching methodologies have not yet
completely shifted towards a truly
active and student-centred pedagogy that
fully acknowledges the influence of audiovisual media in students’
lives.8
The patterns of modern Law School education
were laid in an era of nearly total print dominance.9
The educational concepts articulated were print-centred, where the main
objective of Law School was to dissect published edited appellate
court
decisions, and then to use this skill to achieve mastery of legal thought over a
body of learning that itself had been shaped
and disciplined by its reduction to
print.10 As put forward by Goldfarb, ‘writing and
reading occupied a space of privilege in the Western tradition of education and
literacy
for the most of the twentieth century, making these skills key factors
in subjects’ identity and status relative to
community’.11
In the last few decades, images
have earned a new status in some educational contexts other than the Law School
and they have become
a representational mode of choice well beyond their
previous status as illustration.12 The visual has thus
taken on a new importance not only in the scheme of knowledge representation but
also in the formation of identity
and community relative to how knowledge is
accessed and lived.13
Despite this change in
paradigm, the prevailing teaching methods in Canadian Law Schools continue to be
print-centred and focused
on the instructor, whose role is still conceived as a
major conveyor of knowledge contained in published court decisions compiled
in
legal casebooks.14 The teaching activities still give
students marginal involvement, and most importantly,15
the teaching methods do little, if anything, to encourage students to create and
produce their own (and collective) legal texts and
knowledge, whether media
centred or not.16
III VISUAL PEDAGOGY
The rapid expansion of global communications media
and visual culture in this digital era has shaken the structure of societies
globally
and has radically altered the dissemination and production of
information and knowledge.17 This revolution is
fundamentally transforming our notions of education and learning, and at the
same time, it is altering the way
we apprehend reality. It has changed the means
that people, particularly those who have grown up in this paradigm, use to
communicate
with one another, the concepts they form, and the structure of their
thought.18
Unlike other active teaching pedagogies
that consider audiovisual technologies as mere supplements to traditional
classroom and print-based
education,19 visual pedagogy
places audiovisual languages at the forefront of classroom
teaching.20 Visual pedagogy recognizes the unique
advantages that audiovisual media have as powerful transforming tools. For
Goldfarb, when used
as a tool in the classroom, the power of audiovisual media
enables a level of interactivity and critical thinking not seen in traditional
schooling.21 Visual pedagogy advocates the teaching of
media literacy across the curriculum,22 and as part of
a plan that is sensitive to the diverse concerns, knowledge, and experiences of
students.23 Media literacy has been conceptualized as
the ‘the process of critically analyzing and learning to create
one’s own messages
— in print, audio, video, and multimedia, with
emphasis on the learning and teaching of these skills through using mass media
texts’.24 It includes the cognitive and affective
processes involved in viewing and producing audiovisual materials.
IV THE CONTEXT: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
In Canada, legal education consists of a three year
curriculum, which is fairly similar across the relatively few existing common
law schools. During the first year, students achieve basic lawyering skills,
mainly the analysis of edited appellate court decisions,
the identification of
both sides to a position, the resolution of conflicts, and the isolation of
legal issues from non legal facts.
Students develop these skills across six or
seven compulsory courses — generally constitutional law, criminal law,
contracts,
property, torts, and civil procedure. Students also take a legal
writing and research clinic course where they acquire writing skills.
In the
second and third years, students may choose law courses from a broad range of
optional courses. While law schools are free
to adopt their own legal
curriculum, they generally include all those subjects recommended by the
provincial law societies for the
admission to the practice of law. In Canada,
students need to have at least three years of undergraduate education, and
generally
a bachelor’s degree, in order to be admitted to Law School.
However, the nature of legal education is typically undergraduate.
Students do
not write a thesis, they do not research beyond case searches, and their
production of texts is limited to marginal clinical
classes taught by part time
faculty.25
The criminal law course where the
experience recounted below takes place is conceived as an interdisciplinary
course. It focuses on
the study of crime simultaneously from three main
disciplines: criminal law, criminology, and criminal justice. It has been
conceived
as an experimental one year course to offer students a different
approach to the study of law. In this course we analyse a long list
of different
criminal problems, such as homicides, sexual assault, property crimes, corporate
crimes, international crimes, crime
participation, and the elements of the
crime, among many others. The focus is not the appellate court decisions dealing
with these
criminal matters, but the criminal problems themselves. Although
there is a lot of variation in the approach, when we examine any
given criminal
phenomenon we try to delve into three main layers of analysis: (i) the root
causes of the criminal problem, for which
purpose we resort to a wide array of
criminology theories, both traditional and
alternative,26 (ii) the legal solutions adopted to deal
with the problem, including an analysis of the elements of the criminal offence
and its
judicial interpretation both in Canada and other
jurisdictions,27 and (iii) the way the criminal justice
institutions handle the problem and its perceived
offenders.28 We seek connections among society’s
legal, political, economic, sociological, and cultural elements and we look at
criminal
problems and justice institutions from international and transnational
perspectives. This interdisciplinary approach not only enriches
the examination
of legal issues but also actively fosters students’ interest to engage in
criminal problems from a comprehensive
focus. Otherwise, the traditional view of
law teaching which restricts itself to the analysis of edited appellate court
decisions
irritates students who are accustomed to examining topics globally and
comprehensively, and who sense that the isolation of legal
issues, as advocated
by the prevailing paradigm of legal education, leads to impoverished analyses
and solutions.29
V MEDIA ANALYSIS IN THE CRIMINAL LAW CLASSROOM
Since we now live in a visually-oriented and
technology-driven society, our classroom teaching should adapt to the new
realities of
this fast-paced audiovisual culture rather than clinging to
teaching methodologies that belong to other paradigms.
I implemented a
teaching method that makes extensive use of students’ preferred learning
styles without compromising the objectives
of achieving excellence in the
discipline. Although I try not to repeat the structure of my classes by
constantly changing the rhythm
of the class and by varying all classroom
activities, my classes usually have a general common pattern. I always start by
posting
on the blackboard — in a way that resembles interactive menus on
cable and satellite TV — the objectives of the class,
how the class fits
with what we have done and what we will do, the topic of my talk, the class
activities we will carry out, and
what we will cover in the next class. My talk
is usually short and straight to the main points I want them to discuss later.
We then
all embark on the class activities. One of the most successful
activities is the analysis of video scenes from popular TV shows,
such as
Friends, Seinfeld, The Simpsons, Beverly Hills
90210, or even Beavis and Butthead, and commercial motion
pictures depicting criminal events. It is amazing how many crimes are committed
on TV every day!30
As a way of illustration, when
we analyse the crime of stalking I usually show some scenes from the
Friends episode titled ‘The One After the Super Bowl’. In
this episode, Erica Ford (Brooke Shields) has got into Joey’s
building to
deliver a love letter to Joey thinking he actually is Dr. Remore — the
surgeon he plays on Days of Our Lives. When
Erica unexpectedly knocks at
Joey’s door, Joey and Chandler get scared and think she is going to kill
them. We analyse whether
Erica committed the crime of stalking (criminal
harassment) as conceived in Canada.31 We analyse the
actus reus (harassment), and the prohibited conduct (following, communicating,
watching or threatening), the appropriate
mens rea, and the existence of
fear.32 We compare this crime with the stalking offence
in California,33 which differs slightly from the
Canadian version, as it has been conceived as a specific intent
crime.34 This leads to a debate about specific intent
crimes and the possibility of raising the voluntary intoxication defence. We
also analyse
the criminological categories of
stalkers.35 Students debate whether Erica is a love
obsession stalker and whether she also presents aspects of an erotomaniac
stalker, as she
believes Joey Tribbiani is actually Dr Remore, and that they are
having a relationship.
Another example is our discussion of the concept of
mens rea. Here I show a clip from Friends where Rachel is trying to move
Rosita — Joey’s beloved chair. Joey makes it clear that Rosita does
not move because she
is positioned in the exact middle point between the
bathroom and the kitchen and that this position is the perfect angle so as to
avoid any glare reflecting off Stevie, the TV. When Joey heads into his room,
Rachel tries pulling on the back of the chair until
the hinge breaks and the
back falls off. Students are asked to analyse whether Rachel acts with the
required mens rea for mischief.36 This triggers a
debate on mens rea itself and we relate to authors, such as
Simmons37 and Fletcher,38 who
propose alternative views on mens rea. We also analyse criminological theories
to explain the reasons that lead Rachel to offend.
For example, we resort to
Labeling Theories to explain what the societal and the criminal justice
reactions would be toward Rachel.39
Another example
is from the Beverly Hills 90210 ‘Graduation’ episode, where
Steve sees a girl in the hallway who he has had a crush on for years and kisses
her without
her consent. He says ‘for years I’ve wanted to do
this’ and runs away. Students analyse whether Steve’s conduct
constitutes sexual assault, and the type of mens rea he acted
with.40 We examine if this same conduct is criminalised
in other jurisdictions, including common law, civil law, and even Islamic
states.41
Participation in crimes also lends itself
to this kind of activity. For example, in Seinfeld’s episode
‘The Revenge’, George plots revenge against his former boss. With
Elaine’s help he tries to slip his boss
‘a Mickey’. Also,
Jerry suspects that his launderer is a larcenist after he discovers that $1500
he had stashed in his
laundry bag is missing. Kramer convinces Jerry to get
revenge. So, they both go back to the laundry. Jerry distracts the launderer
while Kramer puts a bag of concrete into one of the washing machines. Students
engage in a very lively discussion about the requirements
for being an aider and
abettor, the doctrine of probable and natural consequences, the dual mens rea
concept, and the differences
between the requirements for being a counsellor to
an offence and an accessory after the fact.
Similarly, in the
Friends episode ‘The One with all the Cheesecakes’, Chandler
steals cheesecakes from his neighbour. Despite knowing this, Rachel
cannot
resist eating the stolen cheesecakes herself. This again fosters active student
participation in the examination of the requisites
for being an accessory after
the fact. Moreover the discussions lead to many other aspects of criminal law,
including whether there
is actus reus for theft, or whether Rachel may have a
defence or not. Again, we try to extrapolate the debate to other criminal
justice
systems. We also examine how the criminal justice institutions treat
white, middle class, male offenders in comparison to non white,
immigrant, and
marginal young males. We debate sentencing disparity issues affecting
Aboriginals in Canada, as well as Hispanics
and African Americans in the United
States. A video clip which I usually show to illustrate judges’ sentencing
discretion is
The Simpsons’ ‘The Parent Rap’. In this
episode, Milhouse and Bart Simpson go to juvenile court for joyriding in Chief
Wiggum’s
police car. Judge Snyder rapidly dismisses Milhouse’s case
on the male-centred view that ‘boys will be boys’. When
Bart goes up
before Judge Snyder he is just about to also be freed when instead the
judge’s vacation starts. The replacement
judge isn’t a pushover, and
so, citing Homer’s negligence as a parent, she orders that Bart and Homer
be tethered together.
This clip clearly shows — like in real life —
that two persons acting under identical circumstances can be imposed different
sentences, even for the exact same crime.42
When
analysing sexual assault, I usually show Seinfeld’s ‘The Red
Dot’, where George has sex with the cleaning lady at work. We analyse the
notion of consent under Canadian
criminal law, where there is no consent if the
accused engaged in the sexual activity by abusing a position of trust, power or
authority.43 Students analyse whether George is in a
position of authority with respect to the cleaning lady. They discuss whether
someone who
is not a boss can be deemed to be in a position of authority. They
then examine whether George abused his position.
Similarly, I also show some
scenes from the feature film Election, where the protagonist Tracy Flick
(Reese Witherspoon), an ambitious, overachieving senior High School student, has
an affair with
her teacher, Dave Novotny. I use this film to discuss the legal
age of consent for sexual relationships in Canada, as well as in
some US states,
and the vast series of cases dealing with both coerced and consensual sexual
relationships between teachers or principals
and
students.44 Furthermore, students have to apply
different criminological theories to determine the root causes of sexual
assault.45 We discuss whether any of the prevailing
criminological theories, including those of the Feminist Criminology schools,
can adequately
explain the reasons for the occurrence of this crime. Students
also critically reflect on whether this should be considered a crime
and discuss
the criminal policy justifications in those countries where consensual sexual
relationships between a student and a teacher
are not
criminalized.46
VI STUDENTS’ VIDEO PRODUCTIONS
In order to achieve a high level of media
literacy,47 students also create their own media
productions dealing with criminal matters. For this purpose, I expressly teach
them the conventions
of film language, including camera movements, angles,
editing techniques, and sound effects, and the meanings they can convey. When
we
analyse the video scenes described before, we also pay attention to the
structure of the scene and its relation to the substantive
content of the
message conveyed. For example, when we analyse the famous shower scene in Alfred
Hitchcock’s Psycho to determine what kind of homicide it is and
especially to analyse psychological criminology theories on
crime,48 we pay attention to the camera, editing, and
sound. Students usually launch into a very vivid discussion of Hitchcock’s
use
of film conventions to determine the psychological explanations of Norman
Bates’ murder of Marion. The discussion then turns
to the kind of
homicide, its degree, and elements.
Teaching the conventions of film language
and the actual analysis of these conventions, alongside the analysis of
substantive disciplinary
contents, gives students the necessary tools to make
their own film productions. The results have been very stimulating. As an
example,
a group of students made a documentary based on criminal events that
took place in the neighbourhood surrounding the school campus.
They re-enacted
those scenes, which included sexual assault, drug possession, and white-collar
crimes, such as fraud, and possession
of stolen property. Students also showed
police officers and prosecutors treating minority immigrants more severely than
middle
class white Canadian college students. The students showed the video to
the whole class and we analysed its substantive criminal
content as well as the
film language and structure that students used.
Another group of students
produced a video about recent assaults — in a bullying context —
that took place in a High School
near the school campus. They approached their
production as a documentary. They interviewed the victims of the assaults. They
also
interviewed students that witnessed the assaults. They described what
happened and described the perpetrators of this series of crimes.
They also
interviewed school counsellors who gave their opinion about the causes that led
to the crimes. When they edited these interviews,
students inserted several
scenes of a courtroom to convey the idea that these testimonies took place in a
criminal trial.
Another group produced a video about marital rape in the
early 1980s prior to Canada’s amendment to sexual offences and sexual
assault today.49 Students resorted to black and white
to show the 1980s scenes where the husband forced his wife into sexual
intercourse. The wife
made a complaint and students recreated the criminal trial
in an actual courtroom in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The judge ends up discharging
the prosecutor’s case on the grounds that common law rape excluded the
possibility of a husband’s rape of his own wife.
Then a similar scene
takes place nowadays. Students change to the use of colour to show the new time.
Now the case ends up with the
husband’s conviction for sexual assault as
the marital exception has been abolished in Canada. The use of music and fast
paced
editing conveyed the emotions and feelings of the victim as experienced in
both situations.
VII ACTIVITY PURPOSES
These practices serve several purposes —
pedagogical, criminological and philosophical. From a pedagogical point of view,
as
held by visual pedagogy theory, these activities relate to the way students
are used to looking at the world without diluting the
quality of learning. It
caters to learners who are immersed in a visually and technologically oriented
culture. These activities
also motivate students to read the articles, cases,
and books which are necessary for the analysis of the video segments and
integrate
these readings into a comprehensive analysis of all (visual and print)
texts dealing with criminal matters. At the same time, these
activities help
students develop media literacy. They help students to critically analyse media
texts and to create their own media
messages on criminal matters.
From a
criminological viewpoint, these activities help students demystify the
traditional image of crime as occurring between strangers
on the streets and
where the perpetrator is generally a marginalised member of
society.50 This helps them see that crimes take place
in all social classes and milieus and that most of the times victim and
offenders know
each other very well.
Finally, it ruptures with a unitary,
doctrine-focused and homogeneous conception of the law, which is invariably
concerned with the
print-centred mission of dissecting published appellate court
decisions.51 It proposes a more diversified, open,
cooperative and plural teaching and learning process, which coincides with the
current paradigm
of audiovisual culture in a digital era.
VIII CONCLUSIONS
It is necessary to redefine the prevailing conception of legal pedagogy and teaching methodologies along the lines of the changes in the evolution of society. Television, film materials, and other media texts offer unique teaching possibilities which motivate students’ learning process and at the same time contribute to a more open and diversified conception of the law attuned to the current audiovisual paradigm. Furthermore, as advocated by visual pedagogy, it is also necessary to help Law School students develop media literacy, as this enables a level of interactivity and critical thinking not achieved with traditional teaching methods.
* Assistant Professor, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Ottawa.
I would like to thank Professor Ian Kerr (Ottawa) and Professor Diane Labreche (Montreal), who encouraged me to have a different look at pedagogy. I would also like to thank Leah Aubrecht and Carly Fidler, my research assistants, for their help with case research.
1 Brian Goldfarb, Visual Pedagogy: Media Cultures in and Beyond the Classroom (2002) 1.
2 Renée Hobbs, ‘The Seven Great Debates in the Media Literacy Movement’ (1998) 48 Journal of Communication 16.
3 David F Cavers, Legal Education in the United States (1960) 8.
4 Arturo Lopez Torres and Mary Kay Lundwall, ‘Moving Beyond Langdell II: An Annotated Bibliography of Current Methods for Law Teaching’ (2000) 35 Gonzaga Law Review 1, 8. The authors analyse the bibliography on teaching methods used in Law School and they note that audiovisual methods are used only in few classes as an aid or supplement to other methods.
5 Robin A Boyle and Rita Dunn, ‘Teaching Law Students through Individual Learning Styles’ (1998) 62 Albany Law Review 213, 215.
6 Goldfarb, above n 1, 59.
7 Robert A Stein, ‘The Future of Legal Education’ (1991) 75 Minnesota Law Review 945, 952.
8 Cynthia Weston and P A Cranton, ‘Selecting Instructional Strategies’ (1986) 57 The Journal of Higher Education 259, 262.
9 Molly Warner Lien, ‘Technocentrism and the Soul of the Common Law Lawyer’ (1998) 48 American University Law Review 85, 85.
10 Steven D Smith, ‘Believing Like a Lawyer’ (1999) 40 Boston College Law Review 1041, 1048.
11 Goldfarb, above n 1, 20.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid. As clearly expressed by Goldfarb, we identify with and through the visual; we increasingly experience our everyday lives through media in which visual and sound-based representations predominate.
14 Julie MacFarlane, ‘A Feminist Perspective on Experience-Based Learning and Curriculum Changes’ (1994) 26 Ottawa Law Review 357, 383.
15 Donald A Schön, ‘Educating the Reflective Legal Practioner’ (1995) 2 Clinical Law Review 231, 250.
16 Marlene Le Brun and Richard Johnstone, The Quiet (R)evolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 26.
17 Goldfarb, above n 1, 1.
18 Dan Lacy, ‘Print, Television, Computers, and English’ (1982) ADE Bulletin 072 <http://www.adfl.org/ade/bulletin/n072/072034.htm> at 26 October 2006.
19 Rohnda Hammer and Douglas Kellner, ‘Multimedia Pedagogy and Multicultural Education for the New Millennium’ (2001) 4(2) Current Issues in Education <http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4number2/> at 26 October 2006.
20 Goldfarb, above n 1, 59.Visual Pedagogy rejects the two predominant views — the Frankfurter school and Postmodernism — about the role of visual media in society. The Frankfurter School (Adorno, Horkheimer, Habermas References) considers popular culture and the mass media that produces it as one of the means of oppression by the power elites. The postmodernist view shifts responsibility from the makers and distributors of popular culture to the users who supposedly are able to critically read it and pick from it what they want and need for their social emancipation and sub-cultural identification. Visual Pedagogy shows that the use of media can have emancipatory effects in the short run as well as recuperative effects in the long run. Goldfarb posits that learning to critically read media texts is insufficient to take the ideological sting out of the message, but rejecting the use of media altogether is to deprive students of fundamental tools to apprehend the world surrounding them and to transform and affect it.
21 Goldfarb, above n 1, 1.
22 David R Russell, Writing in the Academic Disciplines 1870–1990: A Curricular History (1991) 1; Paula Carlino, Escribir, Leer y Aprender en la Universidad (2005) 1.
23 Goldfarb, above n 1, 20.
24 Hobbs, above n 2, 32.
25 Harry W Arthurs, ‘Poor Canadian Legal Education: So Near to Wall Street, So Far from God’ (2001) 38 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 381, 381. Law related courses, such as sociology of law, criminal justice, and law and justice, are increasingly offered as part of undergraduate bachelor’s-level studies, which students may take prior to Law School.
26 Edwin H Sutherland and Donald R Cressey, Principles of Criminology (1966); Richard Quinney, Criminology (1979); Robert K Merton, ‘Social Structure and Anomie’ (1938) 3 American Sociological Review 672, 672; Travis Hirschi, Causes of Delinquency (1969); Edwin Lemert, Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behaviour (1951); Willem Bonger, Criminality and Economic Conditions (1916); Richard Quinney, Class, State, and Crime: On the Theory and Practice of Criminal Justice (1977); Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishments (1986); Cesare Lombroso, Criminal Man, According to the Classification of Cesare Lombroso (1972).
27 Julian Hermida, ‘Convergence of Civil Law and Common Law in the Criminal Theory Realm’ (2005) 13 University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review 163, 164.
28 Colin Goff, Criminal Justice in Canada (2003) 1.
29 Lani Guinier, Michelle Fine and Jane Balin, ‘Becoming Gentlemen: Women’s Experiences at One Ivy League Law School’ (1994) 143 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1, 86. ‘To lawyer effectively, a contemporary attorney may need more than the ability to spot issues or engage in quick-response timed legal analysis, as measured by blind-graded examinations.’
30 Sarah Eschholz, Matthew Mallard and Stacey Flynn, ‘Images of Prime Time Justice: A Content Analysis of NYPD Blue and Law and Order’ (2003–04) 10 Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture 161, 161.
31 Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c46, s 264.
32 James L Cornish, Kelly A Murray and Peter I Collins, The Criminal Lawyers’ Guide to the Law of Criminal Harassment and Stalking (1999) 130.
33 CAL Pen Code § 646.9 (2006).
34 Christine B Gregson, ‘California’s Antistalking Statute: The Pivotal Role of Intent (1998) 28 Golden Gate University Law Review 221, 221.
35 Stacy Casper Martinez, ‘Utilizing the Tools: Successfully Implementing the Stalking Statutes’ (2000) 35 Land and Water Law Review 521, 524.
36 Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c46, s 430.
37 Kenneth W Simons, ‘Rethinking Mental States’ (1992) 72 Boston University Law Review 463, 463.
38 George P Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law (1978) 445.
39 Edwin McCarthy Lemert, The Trouble with Evil: Social Control at the Edge of Morality (1997) 1.
40 Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c46, s 271.
41 Hermida, above n 27, 164.
42 Susan R Klein and Jordan M Steiker, ‘The Search for Equality in Criminal Sentencing’ (2002) Supreme Court Review 223, 223.
43 Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c46, s 273.
44 Patricia J Falk, ‘Rape by Fraud and Rape by Coercion’ (1998) 64 Brooklyn Law Review 39, 79.
45 Gillian Balfour and Elizabeth Comack (eds), Criminalizing Women: Gender and (In)justice in Neo-liberal Times (2006) 33.
46 For example, in Argentina consensual sexual relations between teachers and their minor students are not criminalized, unless the teacher abused his or her position of authority to obtain consent. CÓD. PEN. 119 and 120 (Argentina).
47 Hobbs, above n 2, 32. Hobbs argues that ‘media literacy is incomplete unless students get a lot of experience ‘writing’ as well as ‘reading’ media texts’.
48 Larry Siegel and Chris McCormick, Criminology in Canada (3rd ed, 2006) 288.
49 Julian V Roberts and Renate Mohr (eds), Confronting Sexual Assault: A Decade of Legal and Social Change (1994) 1.
50 Siegel, above n 48, 170.
51 Robin A Boyle and Rita Dunn, ‘Teaching Law Students Through Individual Learning Styles’ (1998) 62 Albany Law Review 213, 218.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/LegEdRev/2006/8.html